With United Parks and Six Flags, for fire sale prices some of those properties might be attractive to Universal not to run as the existing park, but as a place to build their other smaller concept attractions. Many are in prime locations demographically, and it’s harder for neighbors to NIMBY building an attraction where there already is/was one.
Both UP and SF have had private equity people on their boards who have advocated selling the land the parks are built on to a holding company, and then leasing it to the park. If the park fails, they’ll sell the land and walk away. It’s what they did to Sears/KMart until they bled the company to death, and the same could happen here easily…