I don't think you're actually reading what I'm saying. My take is that Chucky is very popular with the normal people you're talking about. I'm not saying Ted is unpopular, I'm not saying it wouldn't be a good fit at the event. I am, again, making a very narrow statement:
I think Chucky is more popular with the people who attend Halloween Horror Nights Hollywood, yes, including "normal" people, than Ted. That's it. Again, feel free to disagree with that! But don't put words in my mouth.
Chucky is an evergreen horror character. Ted is not.
Chucky has also existed in some form since 1988. Ted was introduced in 2012.
Chucky has had five theatrical films, two direct-to-dvd films, and a three-season series run on a basic cable television. Ted has had two theatrical films and a two-season series run on Peacock, with an animated series on the way.
That isn't to say Ted isn't popular. The series appears to do well for Peacock, though I think them green lighting the animated series has more to do with the need to internally justify the enormous overall deal minted with Fuzzy Door (Seth MacFarlane's production company) and help keep the would-be franchise alive at a lower cost with the green light for the animated series versus them attempting to meet overwhelming audience demand for Ted. Will it work? Uh, I mean... the closest comp is
Alf.
What I'm trying to say is Chucky has multi-generational appeal thanks to continued, regular investments in the character
and a willingness to meaningfully evolve with the times. It's a phenomenon that we rarely get to see at this level - long-running shows like
The Simpsons and
It's Always Sunny can be similarly instructive.
Could Ted successfully lead a Horror Nights attraction? Sure! But as I've stated here previously, he'd be up against the same obstacles that muzzled Late Night with Chucky. The whole point is he's a foul-mouthed, pot-smoking teddy bear. If he can't constantly drop F bombs or smoke a bowl, it's not going to work. Chucky, as a serial killer, can (ironically) fall back on the violence when he can't swear as liberally as he probably ought to.