Nice sharing...Generally I don't have time for these long videos (watched the entire 42 minutes), but it's raining outside, which interrupted the landscaping I was doing outside, and I still have a long wait for the slow cook spareribs I'm cooking for dinner. So, what the hell, I watched it.
It's quite good. I agree with most of his USF analysis. As I've said before, I like USF, and we spend way more time there than IOA, double or triple at the least. IOA has the better rides, but USF has so much more, and lots to do. The basic failing of USF is it is out of balance with relation to ride attractions. If F&F Supercharged would have turned out to be a very good non screen attraction, we probably wouldn't be having a discussion about USF worth. But, alas, that was the biggest attraction miss of all time, especially with its huge footprint in the center of the park. Simpsons ride is falling apart, so that also needs replaced. But, Springfield is an OK land. Excellent stage and street shows, seasonal events, and Diagon Alley, the best land ever, make USF a very good park overall.
I don't agree with his Disney Hollywood Studios assessment though. It's our second favorite Disney park, though we greatly miss the Citizens of Hollywood and The Great Movie ride. We spend lots of time there since we like live theater shows and DHS has many very good ones, plus it's Disneys' best park for thrill rides at WDW. His poor rating for the park is basically centered around his admitted dislike of most live entertainment theater shows. But that's a major strength of DHS.
Bottom line, I like USF a bit more than DHS, but the difference is not much.