Universal Orlando Resort Expansion (Part 1) | Page 223 | Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
  • Home
  • Forums
    New posts Search forums Account Upgrades
  • News
    Universal Studios Hollywood Universal Orlando Universal Studios Japan Universal Studios Singapore Universal Studios Beijing
  • Merchandise
Log in Register
What's new Search

Search

By:
  • New posts
  • Search forums
  • Account Upgrades
Menu
Log in

Register

Install the app
  • Signing up for a Premium Membership is a donation to help Inside Universal maintain costs and offers an ad-free experience on the forum. Learn more about it here.
  • Forums
  • Universal Parks & Resorts
  • Universal Orlando Resort
  • Miscellaneous Universal
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

Universal Orlando Resort Expansion (Part 1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ReelJustice
  • Start date Start date Jul 10, 2012
Status
Not open for further replies.
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 221
  • 222
  • 223
  • 224
  • 225
  • …

    Go to page

  • 417
Next
First Prev 223 of 417

Go to page

Next Last
Mr. EPCOT

Mr. EPCOT

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Nov 8, 2011
Messages
1,667
Location
The Vacation Kingdom of the World
  • Oct 30, 2017
  • #4,441
JungleSkip said:
I'll believe them actually outdoing TDS when I see it, but aiming that high at least means it'll be a great park. VB is the best water park in the city, IMO, so I'd love to see them improve upon it on Site B. I seriously doubt there will be any monorail, even though I know they want one.
Click to expand...
I am skeptical, as well. Part of it is that I assume that this park would likely be very heavily skewed towards current IP, and I don't know that you could achieve something on the artistic level of DisneySea with just IP. It's certainly much more difficult with the IPs that are left to them that aren't already in use in other parks. So the question in my mind is, are they going to have catch-all areas like American Waterfront, Lost River Delta, and Mediterranean Harbor, or is it going to be Wizarding World Land, Nintendo Land, Jurassic World Land, etc.

I think we'd be super, super lucky to get a monorail. I hope they're able to pull off some kind of elevated transportation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ashhanbre
Z

zg44

Minion
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
944
Age
81
  • Oct 30, 2017
  • #4,442
Mad Dog said:
Generally, with both parties agreeing to mediation, it's usually an indication that they are close to an agreement. If they weren't talking and close to settlement, the parties just would have waited for next year's originally scheduled hearing.
Click to expand...
JungleSkip said:
I'd agree. It's good news.

If Uni gets the rest of this land...wow. They could make the original resort look quaint
Click to expand...
Yeah, I think this means that Universal is planning on a larger transaction with Stan Thomas than the original proposed one before the lawsuit. Originally Stan Thomas was going to keep those 2 FQP parcels next to the 475 and 100 acres. But now that Universal bought that 100 acres; I think they're signaling a more comprehensive deal because that FQP land is needed now given that it's adjacent to both.

Of course, simplest solution is Comcast takes all of UCPM III and FQP, but we'll see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fryoj and Mad Dog
F

fryoj

Webslinger
V.I.P. Member
Joined
May 19, 2013
Messages
3,844
  • Oct 30, 2017
  • #4,443
zg44 said:
Yeah, I think this means that Universal is planning on a larger transaction with Stan Thomas than the original proposed one before the lawsuit. Originally Stan Thomas was going to keep those 2 FQP parcels next to the 475 and 100 acres. But now that Universal bought that 100 acres; I think they're signaling a more comprehensive deal because that FQP land is needed now given that it's adjacent to both.

Of course, simplest solution is Comcast takes all of UCPM III and FQP, but we'll see.
Click to expand...

After looking at the property map, most of the UCMP stuff is useless. By that I mean its designated wetlands/water retention and right of ways. Stuff they really can't build on. The FQP properties are definitely beneficial. And I'd say that today's purchase is more of a sign that a deal is pretty much already in place for the other properties than it is leverage. I'd say they definitely get the FQP properties and the properties that surround the land they own already. Probably end up with all the random retention pond and wetland properties too. The one I'm curious about is the 179 acre plot on the other side of Sand Lake While not directly connected, one of the other UCMP properties would allow back door access to the new property. So I could see it being a remote hotel area line the WNW plot for Uni or I could see Thomas keeping that for development.
 
GadgetGuru

GadgetGuru

Jurassic Ranger
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2011
Messages
2,461
Age
32
Location
Seattle, WA
  • Oct 30, 2017
  • #4,444
Pretty awesome news happening. I'm still convinced that this won't move up the timetables on Park 3 just yet. It's going to take a couple years of building infrastructure before they can really start construction on this third park.

Universal also will have to have a solid idea of what transportation looks like before construction really gets started. I can't see them effectively sharing public roadways for a resort-wide transit system. I just don't think it will scale enough.
 
Mad Dog

Mad Dog

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2013
Messages
23,687
Location
Pittsburgh area
  • Oct 30, 2017
  • #4,445
Niles is saying the purchase price for the 101 acres was $27.5 million. ...Not a bad price if true. That's the price of a cheap coaster.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andysol, zg44 and Joel
JungleSkip

JungleSkip

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2010
Messages
22,245
Location
The Mushroom Kingdom
  • Oct 30, 2017
  • #4,446
GadgetGuru said:
Pretty awesome news happening. I'm still convinced that this won't move up the timetables on Park 3 just yet. It's going to take a couple years of building infrastructure before they can really start construction on this third park.

Universal also will have to have a solid idea of what transportation looks like before construction really gets started. I can't see them effectively sharing public roadways for a resort-wide transit system. I just don't think it will scale enough.
Click to expand...

I still don't think anyone should be expecting much in the way of transit, but that's a gut feeling on my part. There will be buses from the resorts to all other Uni locations, but I'm not expecting anything for day guests to get from the OG resort to Site B.

Mad Dog said:
Niles is saying the purchase price for the 101 acres was $27.5 million. ...Not a bad price if true.
Click to expand...

That's from the news stories on the purchase, so I'd assume that's legitimate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GadgetGuru
Joel

Joel

Jurassic Ranger
Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2016
Messages
2,336
Age
35
Location
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
  • Oct 30, 2017
  • #4,447
fryoj said:
After looking at the property map, most of the UCMP stuff is useless. By that I mean its designated wetlands/water retention and right of ways.
Click to expand...
That's not necessarily useless, you can work retention ponds into the park's design. Where are the wetlands?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JoeCamel and Mad Dog
JungleSkip

JungleSkip

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2010
Messages
22,245
Location
The Mushroom Kingdom
  • Oct 30, 2017
  • #4,448
Joel said:
That's not necessarily useless, you can work in retention ponds into the park's design. Where are the wetlands?
Click to expand...

Yea, retention ponds and the like are going to be necessary. They'll have to reconfigure the large ones in the main plot of land as-is, so getting more included in the land to make bigger (or something) is a good idea
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mad Dog
ReelJustice

ReelJustice

Webslinger
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
4,494
Location
Universal City
  • Oct 30, 2017
  • #4,449
JungleSkip said:
Yea, retention ponds and the like are going to be necessary. They'll have to reconfigure the large ones in the main plot of land as-is, so getting more included in the land to make bigger (or something) is a good idea
Click to expand...
Build a moat around the whole damn thing. Baller af.

Also, a lake for watersports and bass fishing!
 
Mad Dog

Mad Dog

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2013
Messages
23,687
Location
Pittsburgh area
  • Oct 30, 2017
  • #4,450
It's all coming together...............and, special thanks to Disney for D23.....:thumbsup:...more urgency now
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cheezbat and zg44
G

GoUCFKnights

Rookie
Joined
Jul 28, 2017
Messages
89
Age
37
  • Oct 30, 2017
  • #4,451
fryoj said:
After looking at the property map, most of the UCMP stuff is useless. By that I mean its designated wetlands/water retention and right of ways. Stuff they really can't build on. The FQP properties are definitely beneficial. And I'd say that today's purchase is more of a sign that a deal is pretty much already in place for the other properties than it is leverage. I'd say they definitely get the FQP properties and the properties that surround the land they own already. Probably end up with all the random retention pond and wetland properties too. The one I'm curious about is the 179 acre plot on the other side of Sand Lake While not directly connected, one of the other UCMP properties would allow back door access to the new property. So I could see it being a remote hotel area line the WNW plot for Uni or I could see Thomas keeping that for development.
Click to expand...
Interesting, didn't realize FQP was Stan Thomas too. Is Orlando Equity Partners LLC him too? It looks like thats the entity that has been selling off pieces (sold to Ripleys, Top Golf, Andretti Karting, etc) and is right in the middle of the other 2 pieces Universal owns. If its not, I'm curious why Stan Thomas hasn't been selling off pieces like that company has? The Ripley/Karting/Golf place kind of messes up Universal owning almost that entire side of the street. And I'd have preferred to see them on I-Drive, but I guess its too late for that
 
Joel

Joel

Jurassic Ranger
Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2016
Messages
2,336
Age
35
Location
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
  • Oct 30, 2017
  • #4,452
JungleSkip said:
Yea, retention ponds and the like are going to be necessary. They'll have to reconfigure the large ones in the main plot of land as-is, so getting more included in the land to make bigger (or something) is a good idea
Click to expand...

I meant like how Epcot's lagoon/SS lagoon is considered into the equation for retention ponds. Design them as part of the scenery
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ashhanbre, JoeCamel and Mad Dog
Z

zg44

Minion
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
944
Age
81
  • Oct 30, 2017
  • #4,453
Mad Dog said:
Niles is saying the purchase price for the 101 acres was $27.5 million. ...Not a bad price if true. That's the price of a cheap coaster.
Click to expand...
That's way under what I thought it would be. (I thought the minimum price would be $50m).

That Ripley's plot on Universal Blvd. was $23 million for 23 acres last year.

Comcast/Universal got a great deal on the 100 acres if it was at a similar price to that Ripley's land. Yeah it's not off Universal Blvd., but it's right next to where the parks are going to be; I'm almost stunned at how low that price is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JoeCamel and Mad Dog
F

fryoj

Webslinger
V.I.P. Member
Joined
May 19, 2013
Messages
3,844
  • Oct 30, 2017
  • #4,454
Joel said:
That's not necessarily useless, you can work retention ponds into the park's design. Where are the wetlands?
Click to expand...

I probably used the wrong term as I guess wetlands are an actual thing, but I just meant existing ponds, creeks, etc. But I'm pretty sure they won't be able to mess with Shingle creek, and I'm sure theres a distance away from it that is protected as well. Theres also ponds that are surrounded by roads and properties they won't own. I fully expect them to redo the ponds on their existing property, but idk if owning other ponds will help that or if those are already calculated into otherwise developed properties.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joel
Mad Dog

Mad Dog

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2013
Messages
23,687
Location
Pittsburgh area
  • Oct 30, 2017
  • #4,455
Orlando Sentinel story confirms the $27.5 million price. Says the agreement closed late last week.
 
B

Bobharlem

Minion
Joined
Jan 31, 2013
Messages
747
  • Oct 30, 2017
  • #4,456
Joel said:
That's not necessarily useless, you can work retention ponds into the park's design. Where are the wetlands?
Click to expand...

The wetlands are shingle creek, one of the more important ones for the everglades -- you can follow the wetlands area all the way to Lake Okeechobee., source is even further north (it goes right by Mall at Millenia and points north near John Young Parkway). That's on the eastern side of the land, and on the north side of Sand Lake also.

There's also the treatment plant between the creek and the new land they just bought. Basically the wooded area with the creek running down the middle is mostly wetlands, any development they do in that area will be extremely limited.

Lockheed moving (It's kinda getting choked out by tourist stuff anyway) would add another large area to it. That's less likely in the short term, but seems inevitable looking all around it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joel
Z

zg44

Minion
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
944
Age
81
  • Oct 30, 2017
  • #4,457
GoUCFKnights said:
Interesting, didn't realize FQP was Stan Thomas too. Is Orlando Equity Partners LLC him too? It looks like thats the entity that has been selling off pieces (sold to Ripleys, Top Golf, Andretti Karting, etc) and is right in the middle of the other 2 pieces Universal owns. If its not, I'm curious why Stan Thomas hasn't been selling off pieces like that company has? The Ripley/Karting/Golf place kind of messes up Universal owning almost that entire side of the street. And I'd have preferred to see them on I-Drive, but I guess its too late for that
Click to expand...
Yeah Stan Thomas is Orlando Equity Partners as well; all those LLCs are vehicles that he moved land into... but he started selling off land a couple years ago after the foreclosures and whatnot. He's sold all but 18 acres of Orlando Equity Partner's original 125 acres; last year Ripley's took 23 acres for $23 million.
 
F

fryoj

Webslinger
V.I.P. Member
Joined
May 19, 2013
Messages
3,844
  • Oct 30, 2017
  • #4,458
zg44 said:
Yeah Stan Thomas is Orlando Equity Partners as well; all those LLCs are vehicles that he moved land into... but he started selling off land a couple years ago after the foreclosures and whatnot. He's sold all but 18 acres of Orlando Equity Partner's original 125 acres; last year Ripley's took 23 acres for $23 million.
Click to expand...

According to the OCPA site, they still have 32 acres. Not sure how up to date it is.
 
Z

zg44

Minion
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
944
Age
81
  • Oct 30, 2017
  • #4,459
Given that price of $27.5 million (which is a very low $275k per acre), Universal was probably trying to close that purchase before the Stan Thomas-Universal mediation for 2 reasons: 1) whatever they pay per acre for the buildable land will surely be above that $275k per acre, and 2) to bring a much better price to the table than the Orlando Equity Partner (Stan Thomas) Universal Blvd. sales last year which were roughly $1m an acre.

For both of those reasons, Universal absolutely made a good decision to lock in that low price before they pay a lot more to Stan Thomas (if there is a settlement soon) because no matter what happens, it's a great price for that land.
fryoj said:
According to the OCPA site, they still have 32 acres. Not sure how up to date it is.
Click to expand...
Interesting, his site says 18 acres out of 125, may or may not be more up-to-date: Southwood Development Company, LLC
 
G

GoUCFKnights

Rookie
Joined
Jul 28, 2017
Messages
89
Age
37
  • Oct 30, 2017
  • #4,460
zg44 said:
Yeah Stan Thomas is Orlando Equity Partners as well; all those LLCs are vehicles that he moved land into... but he started selling off land a couple years ago after the foreclosures and whatnot. He's sold all but 18 acres of Orlando Equity Partner's original 125 acres; last year Ripley's took 23 acres for $23 million.
Click to expand...
Jeez is absolutely amazing how one man can own all of that land in such a valuable area and still be going bankrupt... (I believe I read he just lost his jet due to non-payment on the loan a few months ago)

Is he LMC Properties too? That appears to be the last major land owner in the area outside of him and redevelopment. Also, any word if Universal is the theme park operator interested in the Artegon site and the property to the south of it? Thats another 100+ acres I believe.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 221
  • 222
  • 223
  • 224
  • 225
  • …

    Go to page

  • 417
Next
First Prev 223 of 417

Go to page

Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.
Share:
Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link

Book with our Travel Partners

MEI Travel

Latest posts

  • Freak
    (P294) Security Overhaul at USH
    • Latest: Freak
    • 4 minutes ago
    Miscellaneous Universal Studios Hollywood
  • rhino4evr
    Epic Universe Food and Drink General Discussion
    • Latest: rhino4evr
    • 7 minutes ago
    Universal Epic Universe
  • Jake S
    Disney Starlight - Nighttime Parade (Summer 2025)
    • Latest: Jake S
    • 13 minutes ago
    Magic Kingdom
  • HandsomePete
    Universal Food Thread
    • Latest: HandsomePete
    • 18 minutes ago
    Miscellaneous Universal
  • Mad Dog
    The Future of Lost Continent
    • Latest: Mad Dog
    • 19 minutes ago
    Islands of Adventure

Share this page

Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link
  • Forums
  • Universal Parks & Resorts
  • Universal Orlando Resort
  • Miscellaneous Universal
  • Style variation
    System Light Dark
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
  • RSS
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2025 XenForo Ltd.
  • This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn more…
Back
Top