Universal Orlando Resort Expansion (Part 1)

[Joel]

DELETING

 

[MagicMagicMagic]

You'll want to exclude the land owned by UCPM III as that is not a Comcast/Universal owned company, so they do not own that land.

Detail by Entity Name

 

[Joel]

You'll want to exclude the land owned by UCPM III as that is not a Comcast/Universal owned company, so they do not own that land.

Detail by Entity Name

Universal City PM and the numbered relatives are all universal.

 

[JungleSkip]

Universal City PM and the numbered relatives are all universal.

View attachment 3909

UCPM III is not Universal

 

[MagicMagicMagic]

Universal City PM and the numbered relatives are all universal.

View attachment 3909

No, they're not. UCPM III, LLC is owned by Fourth Quarter Properties. They own that land.

It's great that you've discovered how useful the Property Appraiser site can be, but it always helps to do a bit of research before posting. This subject has been covered several times over the years.

Edit: And in case you wanted further proof beyond the SunBiz link I provided, here's an article detailing the case that UCPM III currently has pending against Universal trying to block them from being able to develop a a theme park on the adjacent land they purchased:

Suit Says Universal Can't Put Theme Park On Orlando Land - Law360

 

[RichOBJ]

Would that be potentially including other buildings adjacent to the IFly?

No the Walgreens south of it is owned by Walgreens corporate. That building would need to be moved to have a connecting parcel from WNW to iFly. I would also think Walgreens would ask for a lot for that property as its prime corner of the intersection and the traffic of biz through there must be gravy.

HOWEVER, if I'm Universal I would pull page out of Skyplex playbook and offer Walgreens a whole newly revamped store in my hotel/retail center/whatever and hook them on being part of Universal property with all the traffic that comes with theme park traffic.

That with the right amount of money could loosen Walgreens hold.

Just my 2 cents on it.

 

[UniversalRBLX]

Walgreens confirmed to replace Bubba Shrimp?!??!

 

[Joel]

UCPM III is not Universal

No, they're not. UCPM III, LLC is owned by Fourth Quarter Properties. They own that land.

It's great that you've discovered how useful the Property Appraiser site can be, but it always helps to do a bit of research before posting. This subject has been covered several times over the years.

Edit: And in case you wanted further proof beyond the SunBiz link I provided, here's an article detailing the case that UCPM III currently has pending against Universal trying to block them from being able to develop a a theme park on the adjacent land they purchased:

Suit Says Universal Can't Put Theme Park On Orlando Land - Law360

I stand corrected, I remember that lawsuit but didn't put the names together.

I would update the maps but then they're basically back to the other ones we have. DELETING!

 

[JoeCamel]

No the Walgreens south of it is owned by Walgreens corporate. That building would need to be moved to have a connecting parcel from WNW to iFly. I would also think Walgreens would ask for a lot for that property as its prime corner of the intersection and the traffic of biz through there must be gravy.

HOWEVER, if I'm Universal I would pull page out of Skyplex playbook and offer Walgreens a whole newly revamped store in my hotel/retail center/whatever and hook them on being part of Universal property with all the traffic that comes with theme park traffic.

That with the right amount of money could loosen Walgreens hold.

Just my 2 cents on it.

I am not sure that WAG would need an arm and a leg for that piece. With how they are bending over backwards to get the Rite-Aid deal done they might be looking to shed that store along with the others they need to trying to make the FTC happy and bless the deal. I don't know if they could count it towards the 1000 or so they need to get rid of but if it were it may have another motive for selling it. Just one more wrinkle in the pie that makes up the ointment the fly lives on.

I like my metaphors well mixed if you please :whoo:

 

[GadgetGuru]

No the Walgreens south of it is owned by Walgreens corporate. That building would need to be moved to have a connecting parcel from WNW to iFly. I would also think Walgreens would ask for a lot for that property as its prime corner of the intersection and the traffic of biz through there must be gravy.

HOWEVER, if I'm Universal I would pull page out of Skyplex playbook and offer Walgreens a whole newly revamped store in my hotel/retail center/whatever and hook them on being part of Universal property with all the traffic that comes with theme park traffic.

That with the right amount of money could loosen Walgreens hold.

Just my 2 cents on it.

I don't buy the idea that Walgreens would be offered anything besides a large paycheck. Universal under Comcast is very, very scrupulous with their land use. They wouldn't waste it on something so pedestrian as a Walgreens.

 

[Joel]

I don't buy the idea that Walgreens would be offered anything besides a large paycheck. Universal under Comcast is very, very scrupulous with their land use. They wouldn't waste it on something so pedestrian as a Walgreens.

I agree, I believe they would rather pay more money to have control over what's in their properties.

 

[Thisguynamedlee]

So there might not be a third gate ? I'm a little confused

 

[JungleSkip]

So there might not be a third gate ? I'm a little confused

No, there's gonna be a third gate

 

[Thisguynamedlee]

No, there's gonna be a third gate

Ok good my heart dropped a little for a moment

 

[Viator]

So there might not be a third gate ? I'm a little confused

There will be a third gate, it's just confusion on who owns what that the poor @ConvolutedFrippery had to deal with..

 

[Joel]

There will be a third gate, it's just confusion on who owns what that the poor @ConvolutedFrippery had to deal with..

 

[Mad Dog]

View attachment 3922

This is the great thing about the OU forums. While most of the theme park forums get pretty nasty, on OU most people can, and will, laugh at themselves. That lighthearted approach helps make discussions go pretty smooth most of the time. Civility lives on OU.

 

[Brian G.]

This is the great thing about the OU forums. While most of the theme park forums get pretty nasty, on OU most people can, and will, laugh at themselves. That lighthearted approach helps make discussions go pretty smooth most of the time. Civility lives on OU.

HE'S WRONG, YOU'RE WRONG. BANNED!

 

[Mad Dog]

HE'S WRONG, YOU'RE WRONG. BANNED!

.....And that's why I read those other sites, but don't post on them. There are a lot good posters, and many of them post over here too. But there's just too high a percentage of mean spirited crazy people, too many for my tastes.

 

[JoeCamel]

.....And that's why I read those other sites, but don't post on them. There are a lot good posters, and many of them post over here too. But there's just too high a percentage of mean spirited crazy people, too many for my tastes.

It gives me an out for my dual personalities so I can come here and play nice