Fwiw they would have settled quickly on that other woman's shakedown case to avoid going to discovery which would impact on the litigation with Mr Zavala case and simply for the fact they had an extremely good chance of winning but would cost then significantly to defend themselves. She was after $50k. The fact it settled on days also tells me they probably offered her a very low offer maybe 15% of her asking and she immediately took it. Lawyer is probably getting most of it.
The family are entitled robust legal representation and to defend their son's character in public domain. I do hope they find a resolution.But we're probably now to assume uni/county have shared more info and video with Mr Crump, yet he seems to be wholly disingenuous wheeling out the same people he listed at the presser who had pre-existing conditions like it's some class action suit. As I might have said before there's something like 12 of these train/coaster models worldwide that see millions of riders each year without incident, so it does worry when the language is like this is the only coaster of it's kind in the world and they're exposing a major flaw, so Mack should be able to to provide evidence to counter this narrative even if we don't see it