Star Wars: Galaxy's Edge (Disney's Hollywood Studios) | Page 127 | Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
  • Home
  • Forums
    New posts Search forums Account Upgrades
  • News
    Universal Studios Hollywood Universal Orlando Universal Studios Japan Universal Studios Singapore Universal Studios Beijing
  • Merchandise
Log in Register
What's new Search

Search

By:
  • New posts
  • Search forums
  • Account Upgrades
Menu
Log in

Register

Install the app
  • Signing up for a Premium Membership is a donation to help Inside Universal maintain costs and offers an ad-free experience on the forum. Learn more about it here.
  • Forums
  • Orlando Theme Parks
  • Walt Disney World Resort
  • Disney's Hollywood Studios
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

Star Wars: Galaxy's Edge (Disney's Hollywood Studios)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brian G.
  • Start date Start date Aug 15, 2015
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • …

    Go to page

  • 328
Next
First Prev 127 of 328

Go to page

Next Last
ChristopherSE

ChristopherSE

Jurassic Ranger
Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2009
Messages
2,051
Age
28
Location
NJ -> Orlando
  • Dec 19, 2017
  • #2,521
rhino4evr said:
I would think the "seats" are chosen randomly, and am I missing something, are there only 4 seats in each pod? Holy capacity nightmare Batman.
Click to expand...

falconride.jpg


Concept art shows 6 seats. The other two could likely be cut off in the photograph^.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike S, Parkscope Joe and Alicia
darkridelover

darkridelover

Jurassic Ranger
V.I.P. Member
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
1,859
  • Dec 19, 2017
  • #2,522
This is looking like Mission Space meets Star Tours
 
  • Like
Reactions: Parkscope Joe and Mad Dog
Mad Dog

Mad Dog

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2013
Messages
23,587
Location
Pittsburgh area
  • Dec 19, 2017
  • #2,523
darkridelover said:
This is looking like Mission Space meets Star Tours
Click to expand...
Yeah, sure does. I'm thinking the other ride will be the stronger attraction of the two.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blaw923 and twebber55
Nick

Nick

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Messages
31,221
Location
Orlando
  • Dec 19, 2017
  • #2,524
Mad Dog said:
Yeah, sure does. I'm thinking the other ride will be the stronger attraction of the two.
Click to expand...
As it's supposed to be.

They sort of had to make Battle Escape better in order to draw people away from the Falcon. Think about it: If you're the average guest or even a big Star Wars fan, do you want to go fight Kylo or do you want to step aboard the famed Millennium Falcon? The Falcon is going to have insane waits simply because there's going to be a giant replica of the Falcon outside the attraction serving as a weenie to draw guests in. It should be a good ride with pretty good capacity, but if you want a ride that is aiming at taking down FJ and Spider-Man (note I said aiming), then Battle Escape is the ride for you. The sheer joy that guests are likely to have when they come off the ride is what's going to make this ride so popular.

Both rides are smartly aimed at different fan groups. The Falcon is aimed at the fans who grew up with the original trilogy and the Battle Escape Ride, with it featuring the newer characters and the First Order, is aimed more at those who may have just became fans of the franchise because of the new trilogy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jtsalien, fryoj and Mad Dog
Teebin

Teebin

Veteran Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
20,673
Location
East Central Florida
  • Dec 19, 2017
  • #2,525
Which one is the big circles that we have seen and which one is the At-Ats?
 
Alicia

Alicia

Superstar
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
13,873
Location
Orlando
  • Dec 19, 2017
  • #2,526
Teebin said:
Which one is the big circles that we have seen and which one is the At-Ats?
Click to expand...
Big Circles = Falcon
AT-AT = Battle

Falcon ride is mini simulators on slow-moving turntable

Battle ride is trackless ride vehicles through sets, with AAs and screen-based backgrounds (not 3D)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jones14, jtsalien and Teebin
Nick

Nick

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Messages
31,221
Location
Orlando
  • Dec 19, 2017
  • #2,527
Let's keep this on the topic of Galaxy's Edge.

For throwing stuff against the wall about the future of Star Tours, let's do that over here: Future of Star Tours (DHS) | Page 5 | Inside Universal Forums
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scott W., ush.hacker, twebber55 and 1 other person
GadgetGuru

GadgetGuru

Jurassic Ranger
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2011
Messages
2,461
Age
32
Location
Seattle, WA
  • Dec 19, 2017
  • #2,528
I'm a little confused. Do we have ideas of capacities for the Falcon or Battle Escape rides?

You have a detailed cockpit fitting 6 on the Falcon. How many cockpits could there possibly be? Let's say 20 (!!) for the sake of argument. That's 120 people per cycle. The ride will be 4 minutes (average ride length? I'm really guessing here) ish, plus load/unload. I would think load/unload would be long because of people wanting to take pictures. Let's say 6 minutes for a full cycle. That's 120 people per cycle, 10 cycles an hour for an hourly capacity of 1200 people. That's nothing.

Something just seems off to me. The cockpit is way too detailed and way too big.
 
F

fryoj

Webslinger
V.I.P. Member
Joined
May 19, 2013
Messages
3,842
  • Dec 19, 2017
  • #2,529
GadgetGuru said:
I'm a little confused. Do we have ideas of capacities for the Falcon or Battle Escape rides?

You have a detailed cockpit fitting 6 on the Falcon. How many cockpits could there possibly be? Let's say 20 (!!) for the sake of argument. That's 120 people per cycle. The ride will be 4 minutes (average ride length? I'm really guessing here) ish, plus load/unload. I would think load/unload would be long because of people wanting to take pictures. Let's say 6 minutes for a full cycle. That's 120 people per cycle, 10 cycles an hour for an hourly capacity of 1200 people. That's nothing.

Something just seems off to me. The cockpit is way too detailed and way too big.
Click to expand...

6 per cockpit. 7 per turntable. 4 turn tables. 168 per cycle. No way it's a 2 minute load/unload. I'm almost betting we get separate load and unload to save time. If they can a rotate and load in 1 minute, thats 2400 per hour. and would be a 5 minute ride time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HereWeGo, Andysol and twebber55
ush.hacker

ush.hacker

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Dec 10, 2016
Messages
1,383
Location
Studio City, CA
  • Dec 19, 2017
  • #2,530
The falcon ride doesn't look to have steering wheels.
 
Ashhanbre

Ashhanbre

Shark Bait
Joined
May 31, 2017
Messages
429
Age
50
  • Dec 19, 2017
  • #2,531
With my family of 5, I'm almost guaranteed to get one of the 2 front seats. Score!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scott W. and twebber55
Nick

Nick

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Messages
31,221
Location
Orlando
  • Dec 19, 2017
  • #2,532
fryoj said:
6 per cockpit. 7 per turntable. 4 turn tables. 168 per cycle. No way it's a 2 minute load/unload. I'm almost betting we get separate load and unload to save time. If they can a rotate and load in 1 minute, thats 2400 per hour. and would be a 5 minute ride time.
Click to expand...
Yes, the ride will be much higher capacity than it may seem because it's essentially using Omnimover technology for the load/unload.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jtsalien
rhino4evr

rhino4evr

Dragon Trainer
Joined
Apr 7, 2010
Messages
5,488
  • Dec 19, 2017
  • #2,533
If all 6 people have some sort of control of this thing, the that’s going to be one long ass pre show.
 
Nick

Nick

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Messages
31,221
Location
Orlando
  • Dec 19, 2017
  • #2,534
rhino4evr said:
If all 6 people have some sort of control of this thing, the that’s going to be one long ass pre show.
Click to expand...
Expect the queues of both rides to be similar to Flight of Passage according to @Marni1971.

I believe he has said that for Battle Escape, the ride doesn't technically start until what is considered "Scene 8".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alicia
jtsalien

jtsalien

Dragon Trainer
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2011
Messages
6,511
Location
T.A.R.D.I.S.
  • Dec 19, 2017
  • #2,535
Nick C. said:
Expect the queues of both rides to be similar to Flight of Passage according to @Marni1971.

I believe he has said that for Battle Escape, the ride doesn't technically start until what is considered "Scene 8".
Click to expand...

Please for the love of everything in the galaxy, let a different person write and direct the pre-show then :lol:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nick
Alicia

Alicia

Superstar
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
13,873
Location
Orlando
  • Dec 19, 2017
  • #2,536
jtsalien said:
Please for the love of everything in the galaxy, let a different person write and direct the pre-show then :lol:
Click to expand...
You’ll get in the Millennium Falcon and, uh, fly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sjago13 and Jones14
F

fryoj

Webslinger
V.I.P. Member
Joined
May 19, 2013
Messages
3,842
  • Dec 20, 2017
  • #2,537
Nick C. said:
Yes, the ride will be much higher capacity than it may seem because it's essentially using Omnimover technology for the load/unload.
Click to expand...

If the art we've seen with the cockpit hall it accurate though, can it really keep moving the whole time? Wouldn't it have to line up with the hallway and stop while people are boarding? Unless the hallway itself can move too, I can't see a way to do that.
 
Alicia

Alicia

Superstar
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
13,873
Location
Orlando
  • Dec 20, 2017
  • #2,538
fryoj said:
If the art we've seen with the cockpit hall it accurate though, can it really keep moving the whole time? Wouldn't it have to line up with the hallway and stop while people are boarding? Unless the hallway itself can move too, I can't see a way to do that.
Click to expand...
The basic description of the turntable patent allows for it to go 4 times slower at load/unload too. Perhaps they could literally move the boarding tunnel to sync with the (very) slow-moving RV pod to simulate NOT moving while you load. Most of the long tunnel stays still, but the final little room where only your party enters could (theoretically) move in sync with your vehicle. In any case, the load area is much slower than the regular ride path using this system.

From the patent:

More particularly, a ride system is provided that may be operated to achieve an omnimover ride with a generally circular path. Significantly, passenger vehicles are “chained” together as with prior omnimovers, but the vehicles may have varying velocities by changing their radial positions along differing portions of the ride path (e.g., a smaller radius in a station to facilitate loading and unloading and a greater radius in a show space or portion of the ride path to increase vehicle velocity such as by 50 to 100 percent or more).

The ride system includes a stationary and centrally-located platform for loading and unloading passengers and a turntable assembly.​

I think part of the reason the load station is in the center of the circle is that the RV travels slower when moved towards the middle, than when moved outwards to edge of the circle. See the illustration below:
US20130059670A1-20130307-D00010.png
By moving inwards the vehicle is traveling less distance, like a runner on the inside track. When the ride really begins after load, it moves outward, so travels a farther distance, not only giving more time for the ride, but also traveling 4 times as fast. Moving in the middle makes it twice as fast as the load platform, and so on.
US20130059670A1-20130307-D00004.png
And don't even get me started on what it'll feel like when the ride moves up and down while moving in and out along the path! Wow, this ride may feel crazy.
US20130059670A1-20130307-D00006.png
Note: It probably goes without saying, but for patent purposes regular omnimover ride vehicles are shown, but for this attraction imagine small simulator pods instead.

EDIT: I think my point is this giant turntable is already going really really slow, but they've figured out a way to move the RV to the inner part of the circle to make it even slower at load. With the ground moving at the same speed as the RV, you may not even realize it's moving.

DOUBLE EDIT: If you look closely at Figure 11B above, you may notice half of the ride vehicles are on the outside of the circle at Load/Unload area... That's because the system can actually go around twice for one show. That makes the ride twice as long, giving two full revolutions. Only every other car is in the load position at the load area, the others are still only half-way through their ride. So, yea. Something to think about.
 
Last edited: Dec 20, 2017
  • Like
Reactions: JPRA513, Scott W., shiekra38 and 4 others
F

fryoj

Webslinger
V.I.P. Member
Joined
May 19, 2013
Messages
3,842
  • Dec 20, 2017
  • #2,539
AliciaStella said:
The basic description of the turntable patent allows for it to go 4 times slower at load/unload too. Perhaps they could literally move the boarding tunnel to sync with the (very) slow-moving RV pod to simulate NOT moving while you load. Most of the long tunnel stays still, but the final little room where only your party enters could (theoretically) move in sync with your vehicle. In any case, the load area is much slower than the regular ride path using this system.

From the patent:

More particularly, a ride system is provided that may be operated to achieve an omnimover ride with a generally circular path. Significantly, passenger vehicles are “chained” together as with prior omnimovers, but the vehicles may have varying velocities by changing their radial positions along differing portions of the ride path (e.g., a smaller radius in a station to facilitate loading and unloading and a greater radius in a show space or portion of the ride path to increase vehicle velocity such as by 50 to 100 percent or more).

The ride system includes a stationary and centrally-located platform for loading and unloading passengers and a turntable assembly.​

I think part of the reason the load station is in the center of the circle is that the RV travels slower when moved towards the middle, than when moved outwards to edge of the circle. See the illustration below:
View attachment 5885
By moving inwards the vehicle is traveling less distance, like a runner on the inside track. When the ride really begins after load, it moves outward, so travels a farther distance, not only giving more time for the ride, but also traveling 4 times as fast. Moving in the middle makes it twice as fast as the load platform, and so on.
View attachment 5886
And don't even get me started on what it'll feel like when the ride moves up and down while moving in and out along the path! Wow, this ride may feel crazy.
View attachment 5887
Note: It probably goes without saying, but for patent purposes regular omnimover ride vehicles are shown, but for this attraction imagine small simulator pods instead.

EDIT: I think my point is this giant turntable is already going really really slow, but they've figured out a way to move the RV to the inner part of the circle to make it even slower at load. With the ground moving at the same speed as the RV, you may not even realize it's moving.
Click to expand...


While all of that is possible, I don't think that is the patent for the MF ride. Or at least not in its entirety. That describes the load being in the middle. That's not what it looks like in the the OCR showed a while back.

We saw the blueprints for Disneyland’s Star Wars: Galaxy’s Edge and this is what they show – Orange County Register

In those, the load would certainly be on the outside with the screen on the inside. Moving in and out to replicate speed is possible, but I can't see it being as drastic as what the patent above shows.

Now what you said about the boarding tunnel moving slightly, that is certainly possible. Making the bend be a hinge and have it operate like a airport gangway would allow the turntable to keep moving.
 
Nick

Nick

Veteran Member
V.I.P. Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Messages
31,221
Location
Orlando
  • Dec 24, 2017
  • #2,540
Overview


Battle Escape:




Falcon:


@Teebin, here's a good aerial showing the difference how they will be able to hide SW:GE well enough. The ground level is drastically different where the tunnel entrance is and above the tunnel. Since it has been filled in with nothing but dirt, the top of the tunnel will technically be ground level for that area.
 
Last edited: Dec 24, 2017
  • Like
Reactions: Alicia, Scott W., Teebin and 1 other person
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • …

    Go to page

  • 328
Next
First Prev 127 of 328

Go to page

Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.
Share:
Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link

Book with our Travel Partners

MEI Travel

Latest posts

  • GAcoaster
    Star Wars: Galactic Starcruiser
    • Latest: GAcoaster
    • 1 minute ago
    Water Parks, Resorts & More
  • GAcoaster
    Walt Disney World Tech News & Discussion- Magic Bands, Genie+, and more
    • Latest: GAcoaster
    • 3 minutes ago
    Miscellaneous Disney
  • saint.piss
    No more designated smoking areas in the parks?
    • Latest: saint.piss
    • 29 minutes ago
    Miscellaneous Universal
  • amar831
    Console Gaming (General)
    • Latest: amar831
    • 29 minutes ago
    Games, Movies & Sports
  • LPCaptainDeath
    Horror Movies Thread
    • Latest: LPCaptainDeath
    • 30 minutes ago
    Games, Movies & Sports

Share this page

Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link
  • Forums
  • Orlando Theme Parks
  • Walt Disney World Resort
  • Disney's Hollywood Studios
  • Style variation
    System Light Dark
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
  • RSS
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2025 XenForo Ltd.
  • This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn more…
Back
Top