Then why have a theme park at all... Why not just put a giant Frisbee in Diagon Alley it will be fun!!!
1.) Giant Frisbees are fun don't slam them like that
2.) I need to clarify some points and "story" was the wrong word.
Story is defined as a telling of events, but a plot gives reason. To use a famous quote:
The king died and then the queen died is a story. The king died, and then queen died of grief is a plot.
Theme parks use plot to define why decisions are made in an area. History, people, etc. But mistakes are made when plot is tied to an attraction, such as Gringotts, which is the ride that juggles it the best (but still has major issues with it). The plot of the land dictates it wouldn't have a HUSS Giant Frisbee in it.
A story on a ride works better, there's not much logical to FJ but it works, same for the Haunted Mansion. But in the end there's not plot or justification for anything in the ride. Is anyone wondering the history or justification of the vignettes of HM?
This new ride seems to have a justification in the land, "it's a theme park with dinosaurs so why not have a coaster!", the plot. But just because it doesn't have a story, a series of events, it tells doesn't make it worse. Many rides don't have a story and fit, many rides have a plot and story and don't fit (hi Incredicoaster).